| First | Prev | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | Next | Last |
| Documents Found: 818 |
| Title |
Forum |
Year |
Ram Pat and Ors. vs State of Haryana
Settled possession-Exercise of right of private defence, Accused fully armed-On a question whether the purported overt acts committed by the accused would amount to settled possession so as to enable them to exercise their righ [LexDoc Id : 362937]
|
SC |
2009 |
Narender Singh vs Punjab and Sind Bank and Anr.
[LexDoc Id : 387457]
|
DRAT (Delhi) |
2009 |
Ravi Development vs Shree Krishna Prathisthan and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 362621]
|
SC |
2009 |
Sabir Siddiq Malik vs Bombay Environmental Action Group and Ors.
Unauthorised occupation/encroachment of land-Adjudication by statutory authority-The question whether a person was unauthorisedly in occupation of land could not be decided in a writ petition. Where factual disputes of this nature [LexDoc Id : 362935]
|
SC |
2009 |
V.N. Devadoss vs Chief Revenue Control Officer-cum-Inspector and Ors.
Sale of land belonging to sick company by statutory authorities under SICA-Undervaluation of the market value of the property-The Supreme Court held that the provisions of s.47-A of the Indian Stamp Act 1899 clearly revealed the intention of the Legislature that there should [LexDoc Id : 362928]
|
SC |
2009 |
Zeitumbi Habib Mohamad vs Thomas Roberto Gomes, Administrative Tribunal of Goa and Additional Rent Controller
[LexDoc Id : 362436]
|
HC (Bombay) |
2009 |
Ramesh Kumar Aggarwal vs Rani Ravindran and Ors.
Eviction petition: Application seeking leave to defend-Justifiability of rejecting of application and revision petition-The Supreme Court perused the application filed by the tenant seeking leave to defend in the eviction petition filed by the landlord and opined that t [LexDoc Id : 362357]
|
SC |
2009 |
Rachpal Singh and Ors. vs Gurmit Kaur and Ors.
Triable issues-Application for leave to defend-The Supreme Court observed that if some triable issues were raised then the controversy could be properly adjudicated after ascertainment of truth thr [LexDoc Id : 362355]
|
SC |
2009 |
State of Maharashtra and Sholapur Municipal Corporation vs Bhimashankar Sidramappa Chippa
[LexDoc Id : 362408]
|
HC (Bombay) |
2009 |
Balbir Kumar Paul vs Bank of Baroda and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 395770]
|
HC (Gujarat) |
2009 |
Anil Nemichand Bafna, Hemant Chandan Khinvsara, Pushpa Chandan Khinvsara, Suresh Champalal Kankaria, Dilip Nemichand Bafna, Rajendra Nemichand Bafna, Pradeep Nemichand Bafna, Amit Anil Bafna and Anita Anil Bafna vs State of Maharashtra and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 386849]
|
HC (Bombay) |
2009 |
Devendra and Ors. vs State of Uttar Pradesh and Anr.
[LexDoc Id : 371375]
|
SC |
2009 |
P.V. Manickam (Dead) through L.Rs.vs Gopalswamy Naicker Charitieds Trust and Anr
Contention that case of fraud not considered by high court-No case of fraud made by appellant, No finding on question of fraud-The Supreme Court refused to accept the contention that the high court had failed to consider the case of fraud in holding whether the release and sur [LexDoc Id : 363161]
|
SC |
2009 |
Costa Pinto and Associates and Ors. vs Prestige Holiday Resorts Ltd.
[LexDoc Id : 362410]
|
HC (Bombay) |
2009 |
Bharat Prasad and Ors. vs State of Bihar and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 362365]
|
SC |
2009 |
Abdul Rasheed and Osman vs Deputy Charity Commsisioner, Joint Charity Commissioner, Gous and Gulam Ahmed Qureshi
[LexDoc Id : 362263]
|
HC (Bombay) |
2009 |
Fatima Bagwan and Ors. vs State of Maharashtra and Surplus Land Determination Tribunal
Bhaskar Shinde, Fulchanda Gade and Navnatha Gaikwad vs State of Maharashtra, Surplus Land Determination Tribunal, Kallam, Fatima Bagwan and Anr.
[LexDoc Id : 362261]
|
HC (Bombay) |
2009 |
Madhao Bapat vs State of Maharashtra, Collector, Additional Special Land Acquisition Officer and Maharashtra Airport Development Co. Ltd.
[LexDoc Id : 362433]
|
HC (Bombay) |
2009 |
Maria Margarida Sequeira Fernandes, Maria Lilia Elena De Sequeira Sukhija, Maria Tereza Amina de Sequeira Mehta, Suresh Mehta and Maria Manuela Sushila de Sequeira vs Erasmo Jack de Sequeira, Maureen Preciosa Filomena de Sequeira and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 362412]
|
HC (Bombay) |
2009 |
Maddineni Koteswara Rao vs Maddineni Bhaskara Rao and Anr.
Suit for partition-Disposal of suit only with passing of final decree-The Supreme Court, considering whether the high court and the trial court were justified in allotting two shares in favour of the respondent on the ba [LexDoc Id : 362212]
|
SC |
2009 |
Manisha Lalwani vs D.V. Paul
Conditional decree directing deposit of amount-Non-deposit of amount by respondent-The Supreme Court held that for the purpose of executing the decree, whether money had been deposited or not, it was not necessary to hold an inquiry [LexDoc Id : 362209]
|
SC |
2009 |
Sushil Kumar Jain vs Manoj Kumar and Anr.
Amendment of written statement: Justifiability of disallowance-Inadvertence and confusion in the original written statement-The law was well settled that an amendment of a plaint and amendment of a written statement were not necessarily governed by exactly the same principl [LexDoc Id : 362128]
|
SC |
2009 |
Armando Pereira and Sharayu Pereira vs Jude D'souza, Agnel D'souza, Valeriano D'souza, Cajetan D'souza, Domnic D'souza, Joao Sebastiao Pereira, Joao Pereira, Francis Moreira, S.M. Dessai, Dena Bank, Hanumant Chari, Subhash Chari and Shekhar Shirwaikar
[LexDoc Id : 362262]
|
HC (Bombay) |
2009 |
Vishnu Bhicaro @ Bhikani Dessai vs Deputy Collector (L.A.), State of Goa and Cuncolim Municipal Council
[LexDoc Id : 362025]
|
HC (Bombay) |
2009 |
Lehja Bai (Dead) through L.Rs vs Sewanti Bai and Anr.
[LexDoc Id : 362000]
|
SC |
2009 |
| |
| First | Prev | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | Next | Last |
| |
